|
Castro's Socialism
Fails Workers
Wilson C. Lucom. NewsMax.com.
Monday, Sept. 6, 2004.
Under Cuba's socialist system, the average
working person earns about $10 a month -
34 cents a day, $120 a year - on which to
live: to buy food and clothing and pay for
rent for the entire month.
In Cuba, retirees on social security live
on $4 a month - 14 cents a day, $48 a year.
The average wage of a working person living
in the democratic, capitalist United States
is about $520 a week, $2,080 a month, $25,000
a year.
Although Cuba has a good education system,
once students graduate they cannot earn
a decent wage. For example, a computer engineer
graduate in Cuba earns $360 a year, compared
with an independent computer engineer in
the United States, who earns $60,000 a year.
A comparison between Cuba and the United
States is made as follows:
|
Cuba |
U.S. |
Difference |
| Average
yearly wage |
$120 |
$25,000 |
$24,880 |
| Average
monthly wage |
$10 |
$520 |
$510 |
| Average
daily wage |
$0.34 |
$104.00 |
$103.66 |
The Cuban working person's human rights
are grossly violated, but no one talks about
these violations. It is time the world and
its media started taking notice and talking
about the huge differences to the working
person between living under capitalism and
living under socialism.
Cuba is only 90 miles from the United States
and could enjoy almost similar wages, but
the egomaniac Castro, for his own self-aggrandizement,
has kept 11 million Cuban people in virtual
poverty for 30 years. He was not elected
by popular vote; he should now hold free
elections with a socialist candidate (not
Castro) and a capitalist candidate and let
the people decide which system they wanted
to work for and live under.
An article from Investor's Business Daily,
July 19, 2004, best sums up the comparison:
Work Doesn't Pay in Havana, So Leisure
'Industry' Thrives
W. Michael Cox
Fidel Castro's socialist dictatorship has
kept Cuba a poor place - especially when
compared with the 77-year-old dictator's
ideological adversary, the capitalist U.S.
Although many Cubans are well educated,
they earn about $10 a month in farming or
working in state stores, factories and offices.
Many of Havana's once stately buildings
are crumbling, neglected for decades after
Castro stole the nation's wealth and redistributed
it to the poor.
For most Cubans, a good meal consists of
rice and beans. Stores offer a bare-bones
selection of maybe two dozen items - packets
of sugar on one shelf, a few bottles of
soda on another. Kids gratefully accept
soap as a gift from tourists.
Despite material want, many Cubans pleasantly
while away their time at leisure pursuits,
becoming virtuosos at singing, dancing and
playing instruments.
In one small-town library, for example,
four saxophone players enchanted me with
classical music on a Wednesday evening.
It was my very own Buena Vista Social Club.
The grass-roots artistic flowering raises
the conundrum of Cuba: How does a society
on the brink of economic failure produce
so many accomplished performers?
At first, I thought Cubans were just lazy,
preferring to play rather than work. To
an economist, that answer didn't cut it
- if only because of the obvious energy
Cubans put into enjoying themselves.
Cubans' real problem lies elsewhere - in
socialism's perverse incentives.
When the state provides for its citizens
regardless of how much they work, nobody's
motivated to put much effort into their
job. When work doesn't pay, precious little
gets produced, so consumers don't have much
to buy.
Bare shelves give individuals little incentive
to forsake leisure in favor of work. Over
time, the economy spirals downward, like
water circling a drain, with living standards
sinking toward subsistence and citizens
inclined to work only the minimum.
Any initiative at all comes outside the
system. Cuba's go-getters make a few extra
pesos off the tourist trade by turning cars
into cabs, or homes into restaurants and
boarding houses.
Like Americans, Cubans strive for the most
satisfying mix of consumption and leisure.
What's different is socialism has made
leisure, when measured in terms of foregone
consumption, incredibly cheap. So Cubans,
quite intelligently, channel their time
and energy into leisure activities.
In short, they've become connoisseurs of
leisure - and they've done it despite the
fact that Cuba's state-run economy doesn't
provide the kind of recreational cornucopia
found in America.
There are no multiplex movie theaters,
amusement parks or shopping malls. Cubans
indulge in what's available - music, dance,
art, sports and games, becoming quite good
at them.
Applying the same economic logic to the
U.S., we see a very different trade-off
between consumption and leisure.
Our free-market economy provides plentiful
jobs and high wages, giving Americans ample
opportunities to earn money.
No American has to worry about how to spend
it. We live in a consumer's paradise, where
grocery stores sell up to 40,000 items.
Americans don't work even more than they
do because leisure time is a normal good.
Most of us want more of it as we get wealthier,
and we sacrifice some consumption to get
more free time.
A rich variety of entertainment and activities
compete for Americans' work time - movies,
sports, concerts, television, video games,
hobbies, shopping and so much more. Is there
any wonder why few Americans have learned
to sing, dance or strum a guitar as well
as the Cubans?
Some Americans might regard singing and
dancing through life as preferable to the
workaday world of rush projects and bulging
e-mailboxes.
They should remember that Cubans endure
harsh living standards, a trade-off few
Americans would make for added free time.
By finding some happiness in Castro's economic
wasteland, Cubans show the resilience of
the human spirit. What Cubans really want,
though, is relief from a system that grinds
them into poverty. They want opportunity.
If free to choose, Cubans would no doubt
make themselves better off by spending more
time working to consume and less time on
leisure.
Wilson C. Lucom is co-founder, with Reed
Irvine, of Accuracy in Media (AIM). Lucom's
first grant started AIM. For over 25 years
he was a vice president and a director of
AIM. For many years Lucom was editor of
Accuracy in Academia's newspaper, now called
Campus Report. During the Roosevelt administration,
Lucom served as an assistant to the Secretary
of State in the State Department and Acting
Chief of Mission, United Nations Relief
and Rehabilitation Administration.
All Rights
Reserved © NewsMax.com
|